Skip to main content

Table 1 Description and evaluation use case 1

From: A database for oncological research and quality assurance: implementation and first experiences with the University Clinical Cancer Registry Regensburg

Use case

1. Impact of covid-19 pandemic on oncological treatment: retrospective analysis of data of the University Cancer Center Regensburg (UCC-R) in Germany

Description

 Remark/objective

Current topic; across centers; large patient collective; no outcome-analysis

 Study design

Only retrospective; no control-group

 Data period

Past 3 years (2019–2021); all data since introduction of cancer registry law (2017)

 Opportunities

Large number of cases for all relevant centers available in the database

Research possibility of the system sufficient to get an overview

 Risks/limitations

Several necessary parameters not available in database (e.g. diagnostics); diagnosis often not defined well (distinct point if time, clinical etc.)

Fundamentals of documentation not always uniform across centers

→ Data quality varying throughout centers

Oncological basis dataset not sufficient

Evaluation

 Selection of software

No relevant negative aspects

Adaptation of covered data items desirable

 Database/data migration

No significant impairment through migration due to consideration of only more recent certification-relevant (primary) diagnoses

→ Already mainly standardized documentation in previous system

 Data analysis process

Simple concept, few variables, clear timetable, only retrospective analysis → easy contemplation of proposal document

Data extraction easy without connection of forms in the software

Statistics (i.e. descriptive, correlations) with training materials practicable